Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: YouTube video reveals kids "rebelling" against hea...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: YouTube video reveals kids "rebelling" against hea...: The new Federal Government guidelines are now enforcing healthy eating amongst America’s youth. Unfortunately, too many kids are rebelling...

YouTube video reveals kids "rebelling" against healthy eating in school

The new Federal Government guidelines are now enforcing healthy eating amongst America’s youth. Unfortunately, too many kids are rebelling and have educators wringing their hands. A recent YouTube video covers the story, showing the drama behind the scenes while highlighting the changes at the forefront (http://youtu.be/olZVsiH3qrY).

The major problem is the waste of food, which is now occurring more often than ever due to the change. The real tragedy is the lack of discipline and appreciation for food that these kids obviously do not have. With so many hungry children who look forward to (at the very least) their one meal of the day (via school lunch) it’s an outright atrocity and shame to see the kids respond to the new stepped up efforts.

So who’s to blame, the parents or the kids? Personally, and I speak as a parent, education starts in the home including our children’s eating habits. Fundamental nutrition and how food is valued begins with the parent(s), so in part, the finger points back to the parent.

When our kids eat outside the home, they look for an extension of what is served at home. If they’re not used to eating healthy balanced nutritional meals, then when they are out in public they won’t be attracted to nutritional choices. If their meal at home consists of fast food, junk food and/or highly preserved food, then so will their diet become wherever they go.

The evidence of their wastefulness should tell American’s we have a deeper problem than just nutrition in our society; we have a generation of kids who view food as an “entitlement” rather than a hard-earned necessity. Whether it’s the parents or taxpayers money paying for the food, kids should be taught to “value” what doesn’t come free.

I also blame the kids. Poor behavior and a lack of appreciation both represent a “spoiled brat” mentality. Can we only imagine how the kids, who didn’t have breakfast and probably won’t have dinner, feel when they watch their peers “throw away” their meals? Those two extremes are not so unusual in America anymore, are they?

The greater question is, “How do we change our culture in the public school system in order to facilitate increased awareness and appreciation for healthy nutritional food?” The following are a few ideas that might help:

*Focus groups – Nothing works better than empowering people to change versus telling someone they “must” change. A much more effective way to help anyone to change is to engage them in the process, through allowing them to contribute to the choices about which healthy foods they would most likely eat.

*Feedback – According to the video, a good majority of the food is being thrown away. This should be a “red flag” telling us that something is not working. Personally, I wouldn’t want to eat packaged fruit or bland salads. But what I would eat is fresh fruit, and more well rounded salads that include products like fresh fruit, almonds, a sprinkle of low fat cheese, with maybe some kidney beans or chopped grilled chicken to top it off. Treat the students like “customers” and ask for their opinion instead of just recipients of an idea. One forces; the other engages. Anytime we “engage” someone in the process we succeed at accomplishing the goal.

*Repurpose – Unopened packaged food should be set aside and given away at the end of the day. There are too many hungry kids who go home hungry to waste the food that wasn’t opened. If we allow the kids to “donate” back the food, then at least we won’t be wasting it.

*Create a cultural movement - Remove all unhealthy snacks from snack and soda machines in the school, including teachers and administrators lounges. Enforce the policy within the entire school, not just with the students. Adults lead by example and kids are watching to see what choices they make.

Change starts in the place where we spend most of our time (home). If we want to stop childhood obesity and the endless list of diseases that come with it, then we (parents) must be our kid’s greatest influence.

Quick Tips for Wellness: If we want to see our kids become healthy adults then we (the adults) must lead by example.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved

Follow me on Facebook at Quick Tips for Wellness and Twitter @wellnesstips4u

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Military "champions" an end to childhood obesity

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Military "champions" an end to childhood obesity: New recruits face new scrutiny if they want to enter the military. Obesity in the military has become (almost) epidemic, costing the gov...

Military "champions" an end to childhood obesity

New recruits face new scrutiny if they want to enter the military. Obesity in the military has become (almost) epidemic, costing the government untold expense while raising the cost of staying healthy is the new requirement. An unhealthy BMI or failure to pass a fitness exam is no longer “acceptable” and can lead to dismissal if not brought under control.

According to military commanders, childhood obesity raises a red flag and is now the new “enemy” of Americans and a threat to national security.

Too fat to fight

“Too fat to fight” was released in 2010 and uncovered some alarming statistics no one was expecting: Over 75% of the candidates applying for entry into the military are unqualified due to obesity. “Mission Readiness” (http://cdn.missionreadiness.org/MR_Too_Fat_to_Fight-1.pdf) raised alarming statistics along with sage thinking about the future of our country’s children. Their primary reason for writing the piece was to challenge Congress to set a standard for children in America, instilling the need for fundamental nutrition and exercise to become the norm in their lives versus a luxury.
Underscored in their proposal were school lunches and the basic necessity for children to learn from childhood how to make “wise” choices.

“To reduce America’s obesity rates we must start with the basics. In addition to exercise, we know that maintaining a balanced diet is key to long-term health and fitness. We also know that the childhood years are critical to the formation of sound eating habits. Millions of children buy breakfast, lunch and snacks in school every day. Properly managed, the school environment can be instrumental in fostering healthful eating habits that will last a lifetime.

We are calling on Congress to pass new child legislation that would (a) get the junk food out of our schools; (b) support increased fund to improve nutritional standards and the quality of meals served in schools; and (c) provide more children access to effective programs that cut obesity.”
If we don’t take steps now to build a strong, healthy foundation for our young people, then it won’t just be our military that pays the price – our nation as whole will suffer also.”

Statistics collected by the report reflect:

*27% of America’s youth, ages 17-24, are too fat to serve in the Military (that’s their words, not mine….I would have used the word “obese")

*In the past decade, the number of states with 40% of young adults considered obese by the CDC has risen from 1 to 39. In the States of Kentucky, Alabama and Mississippi over 50% of young adults are considered obese

National School Lunch Act of 1946

Going back to 1946, the concern for America’s youth was first raised by General Lewis Hershey when he championed the “National School Lunch Act”, later passed by Congress as a new standard for schools to follow. However, walk down a corridor or inside the cafeteria of your local high school and you won’t see the standard being executed. From soft drink to junk food companies, vending machines offer few healthy choices as they tempt our kids to ingest woefully poor nutrition. Why would our local educational system allow such “fruitless” behavior through their endorsement of it existing inside the halls of education? MONEY! The proceeds pay for everything from football uniforms to equipment. As shameful as that sounds, that’s the bottom line. When funding dollars are scarce, desperate educators will allow almost anything to meet their program’s need from whatever source is available.

So what can a parent do to turn this problem around? Start in the home, by setting an example of what is acceptable for your kids to consume.

*Engage your kids when you go shopping for groceries

*Disallow junk food at home

*Serve fresh food at every meal

* Stop using food as a “reward” or “punishment”

*Understand what a “portion” looks like and teach your kids not to overeat or clean their plate because you over-served them

*Make homemade snacks (trail mix) from bulk supply items, like almonds,cashews and raisins

*Teach your children how to cook and allow them to make the family meal a few times each week

Obesity is not just a problem in the Military; it’s a problem in America. Once we face the truth, that obesity starts in the home then we can turn the problem around.

Quick Tips for Wellness: Train a child in the way he/she should go and they’ll avoid a lifetime of obesity induced illnesses.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All rights reserved

Follow me on Facebook Quick Tips for Wellness and Twitter @wellnesstips4u

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Less = More: Denmark study underscores the need to...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Less = More: Denmark study underscores the need to...: Gym memberships are a blessing, but what about the person who can’t afford one or doesn’t take the time to carve out an extra few hours ea...

Less = More: Denmark study underscores the need to change behavior for long term results

Gym memberships are a blessing, but what about the person who can’t afford one or doesn’t take the time to carve out an extra few hours each week? Could making just a few simple changes to your lifestyle make all the difference in the world? And, just how long should your workout be to see a difference?

A recent study conducted by the “Dept. of Biomedical sciences, University of Copenhagen” (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22855277) made some alarming discoveries about finding a balance between the combination of the length of a fitness routine and consistent nutritional choices for our overall wellness. In conclusion, the study found “less” was actually more beneficial.

“No statistically significant changes were found in energy intake or non-exercise physical activity that could explain the different compensatory responses associated with 30 vs. 60 min of daily aerobic exercise. In conclusion, a similar body fat loss was obtained regardless of exercise dose. A moderate dose of exercise induced a markedly greater than expected negative energy balance, while a higher dose induced a small but quantifiable degree of compensation.”

How in the world could anyone recommend smaller doses of exercise to receive the greater benefit? Simply this: Consistency was more important than longevity.

Using three groups of men, who represented a cross-breed of stereotypes, the conclusion revealed one significant result: Lifestyle changes = long term benefits. Sounds pretty boring, but it’s true. In summary, the following conclusions were made:

*Working out 60 minutes or more a day = greater fatigue
*Working out 30 minutes a day = greater sustainable energy
*Longer workouts may lead to less conscious nutritional behavior (reward mentality for working out so hard)
*Shorter workouts lead to more awareness of nutrition and better behavioral changes

We know that muscle weighs more than fat and works to constantly “burn” (raised metabolism) calories as long as we’re not depriving our body of the calories it requires (nutritional starvation + fitness = failure). The scale is only a small indicator when it comes to results. Your body fat percentage is a more likely indicator and should be the first measurement you count on when monitoring your success. You could be jeopardizing your efforts if you fail to feed your body the nutritional health it needs to build a healthier you (muscles, stamna).

The study revealed that the behavior of the 30 minute workout group, were more likely to make other lifestyle changes, like:
*Taking the stairs or walking more during the day
*Changing eating habits through making healthier choices
*Consistency was more attainable due to the smaller and more manageable changes made

Instead of jumping on a bandwagon you can’t manage, just start with what you can:

*Think before you eat – ask yourself, “Do I know the calories, fat, protein of what I’m about to eat?” If the answer is “no”, then take it upon yourself to monitor your eating habits. Keep a journal and make a pledge to calculate your consumption on a daily basis. Once you know better, you do better.
*Aerobic + weight resistant training = Better overall results. Just “bulking up” isn’t the answer. Walking, running or even jogging in place provided terrific aerobic workouts. Try using lighter weight but more repetitions to build strength.
*Eat healthy throughout the day. Grazing is extremely valuable because it “fuels” your body the energy it needs. Robbing your body of healthy calories = stealing your fuel from your constant “fuel burning” resource (muscles). Deprivation = failure.

If you want your overall wellness to change, change your mentality and definition of “wellness”. Lifestyle changes happen over time and have more staying power. Small changes in the way you “think” will guide your body to naturally follow your lead.

Quick Tips for Wellness: Consistency is the key to success.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved

Follow me on Facebook Quick Tips for Wellness and Twitter @wellnesstips4u

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Popcorn lung victim awarded $7.2 million: Is the ...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Popcorn lung victim awarded $7.2 million: Is the ...: A deadly ingredient used to produce the “buttery smelling’” flavor in popcorn just took a $7.2 million dollar hit by Wayne Watson, a Denve...

Popcorn lung victim awarded $7.2 million: Is the government to blame? Absolutely!

A deadly ingredient used to produce the “buttery smelling’” flavor in popcorn just took a $7.2 million dollar hit by Wayne Watson, a Denver, Colorado popcorn addict,who was awarded the large sum in response to his diminished lung capacity.

Diacytel, a chemical used to produce the smell, has been a well known culprit behind a well hid problem in the microwave popcorn industry. Most of its victims have been the workers subjected to the chemical during production. Orville Redenbacher made headlines just a few years ago when it announced their product would be “Diacytel-free”, with many other manufacturers following suit. However, not all complied and the current administration did nothing to step in to demand the deadly product be removed, completely. The closest they came to doing anything about it was to endorse it in 2011 following an FDA investigation (see below comments).

Isn’t that ironic, that the current administration, which is all about healthcare reform, hasn’t done anything to stop the ingestion of deadly chemicals in our food? Couldn’t President Obama at least taken a preventative versus reactive stand to ensure the safe delivery of our food products?

Perhaps, like most of us, Watson thought his only problem was his popcorn addiction. Now his lung capacity is at 53%, and he faces a lifetime of future problems. Wouldn’t it have been nice to know the problem existed, giving Watson a choice in the matter? The biggest question all of us have when it comes to known problems, such as this one, with chemically enhanced food should be: Why hasn’t the government stepped up to have this product removed completely from consumption? An interesting article to read about the history of this problem can be found at the following link (http://www.aolnews.com/2009/12/10/just-when-you-thought-it-was-safe-to-make-popcorn/).

President Obama spent a whole lot of energy on producing a healthcare program yet didn’t take one step forward in reducing the average American’s exposure to toxic chemicals used in the production of our food or lacing the flavoring of it, as well. Wouldn’t it have been more beneficial to focus on making products safer, thus reducing the risks Americans face through food consumption, than to create policies that only band-aid the problem?

2011 FDA ruling on Diacytel
The FDA’s ruling during the Obama Administration’s painfully weak response to taking a stand to stop the use of Diacytel when it found there wasn’t enough reason to ban the use of the product and protect the public:

“In light of these considerations the Select Committee concludes that: There is no evidence in the available information on diacetyl or starter distillate that demonstrates or suggests reasonable grounds to suspect a hazard to the public when they are used at levels that are now current, or that might reasonably be expected in the future.” (http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodIngredientsPackaging/GenerallyRecognizedasSafeGRAS/GRASSubstancesSCOGSDatabase/ucm261273.htm)


The FDA has knowingly turned a blind eye to protect the public by allowing known toxic chemicals to be used in food production. If you want to reduce the healthcare problem in America, start with addressing the root-cause: Chemically laced food.

Until we have a President who stands up to Corporate America’s greed (Monsanto, the largest producer of GMO’s is one of the highest traded stock on the New York Stock Exchange), the healthcare epidemic will only get worse.

Quick Tips for Wellness: Chemically laced food = genetically modified people.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved
Follow me on Facebook Quick Tips for Wellness and Twitter @wellnesstips4u

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: High Arsenic levels in rice point to environmental...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: High Arsenic levels in rice point to environmental...: The Environmental Protection Agency has known about the existence of inorganic arsenic in our soil for over 45 years, mostly from the use...

High Arsenic levels in rice point to environmental toxins

The Environmental Protection Agency has known about the existence of inorganic arsenic in our soil for over 45 years, mostly from the use of pesticides. It seems that lead arsenate insecticides, used until they were banned in the 1980’s, left a lingering effect in our soil and still may be contaminating our food products to this day.

According to a news release on 9/19/12, the FDA is proactively researching and collecting data that should produce solid scientific findings by late 2012:

“The FDA is in the process of collecting and analyzing a total of approximately 1,200 samples to examine the issue thoroughly. This data collection will be completed by the end of 2012. Once the data collection is completed, FDA will analyze these results and determine whether or not to issue additional recommendations.” (http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm319972.htm)

Southern regions produce higher levels of arsenic in food

In the south, where rice is grown, the levels appear higher than in other locations across the country. The reasoning behind higher levels of arsenic may be associated to a few things:

*Farmers using lead-arsenate insecticides before they were banned

*Fertilizer from chickens fed arsenic laced feed

*Water flooded conditions used to force absorption into the root of the plant leading to higher concentrations of arsenic levels

Arsenic is mostly absorbed to the outer hull of rice, and unless the rice is “refined” the hull isn’t stripped away, leaving the higher levels to remain. Brown rice, for example, isn’t refined; white rice is refined. Therefore, higher levels remain in the brown rice.

Organic versus Inorganic Arsenic

There are two types of “arsenic”, which occur either naturally (organic) or unnaturally (inorganic). Inorganic arsenic occurs through pesticides and contributes to the problem of its absorption into plants, like rice.

Low levels of arsenic are found throughout the environment (air, water and soil) and naturally absorb into plant food as it grows, hence making it the largest natural provider of arsenic consumption by both humans and animals.

The more we are exposed, over time, to arsenic, the likely we are to see the side effects of higher exposure. Arsenic potentially affects the way our cells “communicate” and function within our bodies. Some researchers point the finger at various diseases being related to higher levels of arsenic consumption, such as:

*Skin Cancer
*Bladder/Lung Cancer
*Heart Disease

Fortunately, arsenic does not build up in the body and can quickly leave within 48 hours from consumption. However, constant overconsumption possibly leads to the above diseases. Exposure to arsenic can also be found in our water supply. The EPA limits the acceptable amounts to 10 parts per billion (ppb) in public drinking water; however, higher levels of arsenic can be found in privately owned wells.

Organic vs Non-organic rice, variety of grain consumption

According to the FDA, both products are susceptible to the problem of arsenic found in rice due the environmental exposures. However, what is crucial about consumption of grains is that our diet be varied versus concentrated on one type.

“It is critical to not get ahead of the science,” said FDA Deputy Commissioner for Foods Michael Taylor. “The FDA's ongoing data collection and other assessments will give us a solid scientific basis for determining what action levels and/or other steps are needed to reduce exposure to arsenic in rice and rice products.”

“We understand that consumers are concerned about this matter. That’s why the FDA has prioritized analyzing arsenic levels in rice. The FDA is committed to ensuring that we understand the extent to which substances such as arsenic are present in our foods, what risks they may pose, whether these risks can be minimized, and to sharing what we know,” said FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. “Our advice right now is that consumers should continue to eat a balanced diet that includes a wide variety of grains – not only for good nutrition but also to minimize any potential consequences from consuming any one particular food.” (http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm319972.htm)


The most valuable thing we can learn from this lesson is to eat a balanced diet, filled with a variety of healthy foods. Since the majority of the problem with rice seems to rest in the consumption of arsenic absorption in the hull of the plant, then refined rice may be the better alternative. Again, variety of grains in our diet is the key.

Detoxification of toxins

If you want to learn more about natural and medical methods to detoxify your body, see the following link from the “Live Strong” website (http://www.livestrong.com/article/9782-need-treating-arsenic-poisoning/). From vitamin “C” to selenium consumption, there are various methods to use when ridding your body of unwanted toxins. The most natural way to help your body is to consume more variety of grains like legumes, vegetables and whole wheat.

Signs of arsenic poisoning may include severe headaches, nausea, change in nail pigment, diarrhea, hair loss, etc. Hair sample tests are typically taken to determine if you’ve been exposed to higher levels of arsenic and medical treatment can provide you with a healthy, balanced method for riding your body of what it cannot dispose of naturally.

Quick Tips for Wellness: The body can naturally rid itself of reasonable amounts of inorganic arsenic consumption, but only in moderation. A healthy balanced diet of grains is a reasonable approach to lowering the risk of arsenic consumption.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved
Follow me on Facebook Quick Tips for Wellness and Twitter @wellnesstips4u

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: BPA's link to obesity in children draws "growing" ...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: BPA's link to obesity in children draws "growing" ...: The public is becoming more and more aware, of the dangerous side effects from FDA approved chemicals that are wreaking havoc on our health...

BPA's link to obesity in children draws "growing" concern

The public is becoming more and more aware, of the dangerous side effects from FDA approved chemicals that are wreaking havoc on our health. But, could these same chemicals be the culprit behind childhood obesity?

It’s hard to imagine (much less fathom) the government allowing the use of toxic chemicals in the production and packing of consumables, but they have. “Bisphenol A” (aka BPA) is a chemical used to stop the erosion of consumables packaged in plastic and cans. Due to its estrogenic formula, this product is now thought to be linked to obesity in our youth.

According to a recent report in the Journal of American Medicine Association (JAMA), there is a direct link between the two:

“Conclusions Urinary BPA concentration was significantly associated with obesity in this cross-sectional study of children and adolescents. Explanations of the association cannot rule out the possibility that obese children ingest food with higher BPA content or have greater adipose stores of BPA.” (http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1360865)

So why would this chemical make kids obese? Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC’s), aka “obesogens”, disrupt our hormonal system. These disruptors enter our bodies mostly through chemicals found in soy, corn, hormones injected/fed to our animals (cows, chickens, turkey, farm raised seafood, etc.), bottled/canned products and pesticides sprayed on produce. Once ingested, these chemicals mimic estrogen and become fat cells in our bodies through altering genetic functions. But that’s not all they do.

From cardiovascular disease to brain abnormalities, these chemicals are rapidly decreasing birth rates in males, reduce the age of puberty in females and worst of all, our government knows about it:

“Endocrine disruptors are chemicals that may interfere with the body’s endocrine system and produce adverse developmental, reproductive, neurological, and immune effects in both humans and wildlife. A wide range of substances, both natural and man-made, are thought to cause endocrine disruption, including pharmaceuticals, dioxin and dioxin-like compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, DDT and other pesticides, and plasticizers such as bisphenol A. Endocrine disruptors may be found in many every day products– including plastic bottles, metal food cans, detergents, flame retardants, food, toys, cosmetics, and pesticides. The NIEHS supports studies to determine whether exposure to endocrine disruptors may result in human health effects including lowered fertility and an increased incidence of endometriosis and some cancers. Research shows that endocrine disruptors may pose the greatest risk during prenatal and early postnatal development when organ and neural systems are forming.” (http://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/endocrine/index.cfm)

So why if our government knows about this life threatening/altering toxic method, is it being allowed? It can’t be ignorance but perhaps it’s some questionable form of acceptance. The logic may rest on one huge theory or one simple reason.

*Food distribution/provision. Population has increased at such a rapid pace in the past 100 years (almost 6 to 1 in comparison between developing and industrialized countries). Since the inception of the Industrial Revolution in the 1800’s, the boom in population and its demands on society increased our need for food distribution beyond what was reasonably possible, hence the increase in the use of chemicals to preserve our food.

The governmental agencies regulating food distribution cannot simply stop the use of these chemicals without feeling the after effects from doing so. If they did, the cost of food would escalate, the distribution of food would significantly diminish, and countries would fall apart. Unfortunately, it’s a no win situation overall; but you can change your “world” through restrained and cautious practices.

*Stop drinking bottled water. Instead, consume filtered water in a BPA free bottle or a ordinary glass.

*Stop using plastic containers to microwave food. Use a plate, dish, bowl or anything that is not plastic.

*Eat organic food. The cost of organic food can be almost 50% more than nonorganic food. But in truth, we consume too many “empty” calories in our daily diet, hence increasing our appetite to overeat. If you practice eating fresh, whole food, you will benefit your health and wallet, too. Overall, you’ll feel more satisfied, eat fewer empty calories and be healthier (less doctor visits save you money)!

*Wash the skin of everything, you consume. The skin of food has been exposed to pesticides and other chemicals throughout its journey to your plate. Don’t just rinse it; wash it thoroughly.

*Avoid farm raised food (i.e. Seafood). Seafood labels are extremely tricky and often untruthful. “Fresh Catch” sounds healthy, doesn’t it? In reality, many farm-raised products fall under this catch phrase (excuse the pun) and are choked full of chemicals. Ask the seafood manager exactly where the product came from before you assume anything.

Quick Tips for Wellness: Be proactive with your health through educating yourself before you consume.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All rights reserved

Follow me on Facebook “Quick Tips for Wellness” and Twitter @wellnesstips4u

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Designer and fad dieting: Do they work?

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Designer and fad dieting: Do they work?: DNA, Atkins, South Beach, Jenny Craig, Weight Watchers, Blood-type and Nutri-System all have one thing in common: They are “diets” design...

Designer and fad dieting: Do they work?

DNA, Atkins, South Beach, Jenny Craig, Weight Watchers, Blood-type and Nutri-System all have one thing in common: They are “diets” designed to help you lose weight. Each one makes the same claim: Their way is “the way” to lose weight. So which one do you choose since they are each so different in their approach and results? What about the DNA’s claim that it uses your genetic makeup to determine what you should eat? Is it possible, we’re each so unique that we need a special diet? Or is good old fashion advice, like following basic nutritional and fitness still the best method?

Diets don’t work!
The word “diet” implies deprivation, which is exactly the opposite of what you should do to lose weight. Consuming balanced, wholesome nutrition, while incorporating consistent fitness into your life, is the “secret” to weight loss. Fortunately, the DNA “diet” espouses that philosophy through their founder. But do you need to jump on board with yet another “diet” guru to practice common sense? You might, especially if you don’t know the ins-and-outs of nutrition and exercise. However, most people need one on one contact with someone to help them "hurdle" past the obstacles they face along their journey to wellness.

Magic pills and supplements
So why do we believe there’s a magic pill, surgery or diet that will do for us what we can do for ourselves? In a nutshell, it’s this: Corporate America knows how to “pander” to our weaknesses. They know that if they keep us (the general public) thinking we can’t do it on our own, we’ll turn to someone else that will do it for us.

If you have ever paid attention to every diet, fad or surgery designed to help you lose weight you notice a huge price tag with no absolute promises. Take the DNA Diet, for example. You pay for a test kit to tell you what to eat more or less of in your diet based upon your DNA. Seems like a reasonable approach, but here’s what’s basically true about everyone (unless you have an allergic/medical reaction that requires a medically supervised nutritional approach): Every “body” requires basic healthy nutritional food.

Unless you have a medical condition or nutritional deficiency, you should be a good candidate for eating healthy food, grazing throughout the day (3 meals, 2 snacks) while consuming plenty of water (you weight divided in half = number of ounces in water you should consume). Most healthy diets include approximately 60% Complex Carbs, 10-15% Unsaturated Fats and 20-30% lean protein while incorporating a healthy physical regiment, 3-5 times a week, 30-60 minutes each time.

Supplements may play a risk in your health in two ways:
*Contents may not be enough to support a deficiency or too much causing your body to become overwhelmed
*Unless they're prescribed by a medical professional you might have an adverse medical reaction

Muscles versus Fat loss
When someone says, “I’m working out, but I’m not losing weight!”. If that is the case, usually, one of two things are most likely happening:
*You’re gaining muscle weight
*You’re not consuming enough calories to maintain what your body needs when it’s demanding more fuel
****Remember: Muscle weighs more than fat (proportionally). Muscles increase metabolism.

Scale versus Tape
The scale is not the entire picture. If you want to know how you’re progressing, get out a tape measure and a journal. Measure your chest, waist line (at the smallest point), hips (at the widest point), thighs and calves. Once a week measure those same areas. If you’re losing inches then your body is changing in a healthy manner. As you lose inches you, will lose the weight your body no longer needs (unless your practicing body building).

The majority of people who deprive their body of the calories they need to lose weight, initially lose lean muscle mass, not fat. Without ample fitness, they also jeopardize their weight loss goals when they don’t see the scale numbers going down as quickly as they’d like. Instead of relying upon their body measurements they step on the scale and think they’re defeating the purpose. Both are important; however, any reduction in inches are valuable, as well.

Carbohydrates = Energy the body needs
Many “dieters” are convinced they must reduce their carbohydrate intake below what their body needs, drastically reducing the supply of balanced energy. While they may lose a few initial pounds, they painfully find themselves gaining it back wondering why. The saddest part is the answer to losing weight and reaching a maintainable level of wellness is not a mystery at all.

Once you’re able to analyze what you consume versus what you need to consume, then and only then will you be able to determine if you’re consuming too many carbohydrates, versus protein and fat in proportion to a healthy and balanced diet.

First things first
Before you go on another diet, try doing three basic things:
*Journal your food/beverage and activity for at least 4-5 days. Observe (first) how/what you’re doing before you take steps toward changing anything. Don’t try being “good” or change anything; just be honest and write everything down.

As you journal, look up the nutritional content of the food/beverage you’re consuming (calories, carbs, protein and fat). If you don’t own a smart phone or have access to a computer, then use a nutritional guide booklet (usually sold at the checkout area in most grocery stores or visit a bookstore). Total the amounts each day. Once you’ve done that for a week review it with someone who can help you in understanding the results (nutritional expert).

*Determine your nutritional intake needs. If you don’t know how, there are some very basic, free programs on the internet that are easy to follow and will help guide you to understand what you’re doing right or wrong, pointing you in a maintainable direction. Calorie Count is a downloadable phone app and available at www.caloriecount.com. You simply sign-up, maintain a daily food log and at the end of each day it will analyze your results. You can set goals, communicate with other members and read helpful advice.

*Determine your calorie intake. Most of us naturally think we must “reduce” our calorie intake to lose weight. However, there’s more to it than that. The basic balance rests between healthy nutrition and consistent fitness. The Basal Metabolic Calculator will help you determine your calorie needs based upon your fitness level, age, gender, current weight and height (http://www.health-calc.com/diet/energy-expenditure-advanced).

*Fitness Trainer. Body types play a role in how our bodies lose weight and get in shape. There are principally three types of body shapes (Mesomorph, Ectomorph and Endomorph) that have naturally different needs. Easy to follow online questionnaires are one way to get started. If you can’t afford the benefits of hiring a professional fitness trainer or joining a gym, you can find plenty of beginner’s advice online. One website has a basic questionnaire to help you understand your body’s fitness needs and what type of exercise regiment you may want to follow. (http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/becker3.htm).

However, having a professional fitness instructor guide you, even if it’s just for a few sessions, is worth its weight in gold – but only if you’re practicing nutritional habits, as well. If they’re not incorporating a nutritional program along with your fitness program, then you will not see the entire results.

*Dietitian or Nutritionist. Both are educated professionals who know how to advise and direct you in developing healthy and nutritional eating habits. Even when insurance doesn’t cover the visit, you will save a lot of money in the long run by simply learning the basics of nutrition while receiving sound advice.

*Nutrition Specialists, Wellness Coaches. These are individuals who have received certification and CEU’s in the study of Nutrition and they must work under the direction of a Registered Dietitian if they are providing you with meal plans and nutritional advice to comply with most state’s laws. Usually, their fees are a lot more affordable, and their flexibility to work within your schedule is much more accessible.

Before you jump on the next bandwagon, start with taking the time to understand who you are, setting goals for your expectations and committing to following through on a daily consistent basis. Anything less will lead you back to the same viscous cycle you’re already experiencing.

Quick Tips for Wellness: Fad diets are temporary answer to permanent problems.
Nutritional education and fitness training are the best solution that last a lifetime.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright ©2012, All Rights Reserved

Follow me on Facebook at Quick Tips for Wellness and Twitter @wellnesstips4u

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Environmental Estrogen: Is this the link that's c...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Environmental Estrogen: Is this the link that's c...: A recent report by “Scientific American” covered the touchy subject of linking the rising concern between women’s health risks and the env...

Environmental Estrogen: Is this the link that's causing cancer in women?

A recent report by “Scientific American” covered the touchy subject of linking the rising concern between women’s health risks and the environment, specifically the use of pesticides in the agriculture of food and how the future of their children’s health may be impacted. To read the article in full context, see the following link (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=womens-risk-of-reproductive-disease-linked-to-environmental-estrogens&page=2).

The controversy over genetically modified (GMO) pesticide induced food like soy has long been in question. In short, the Scientific American article covered some extremely compelling results from various scientific studies:

*Chemicals may irreversibly alter the set up of how cells develop and possibly alter the circuitry through which cells communicate with each other

*Premature menopause and polycystic ovarian type cysts may be linked to future health problems

*The estrogenic fungicide vinclozolin, used by the wine industry, poses a threat to the tested rats, reprogramming genes in rats as they developed
(See the following link to learn more about why Europe has banned the use of vinclozolin http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/doc/166r.pdf). Below, is a statement from the link about the ban on vinclozolin in Europe:

“The active substance vinclozolin was subject to the peer review under Directive 91/414/EEC (list 1). Vinclozolin was not included in Annex I because no decision for inclusion/non inclusion in Annex I has been taken by the deadline of 31/12/2006 for finalization of the review programme for substances in list 1. Therefore, the use of vinclozolin on any crop grown in Europe was formally no longer authorised starting 1 January 2007. Nevertheless, considering any period of grace possibly granted at Member State level, treated commodities resulting from those uses might have circulated on the European market still after 1 January 2007. However, it is considered that to date no crops should be on the EU market with residue of vinclozolin arising from EU uses of this active substance.”



The “delicate” balance between estrogen and progesterone (both produced in a woman’s body) are not meant to be overproduced through chemically induced food. When a woman consumes too much estrogen, especially through chemically induced products, the balance is thrown off. As that process begins, a woman’s body responds in a variety of ways: Early menstruation cycles, mood swings, weight gain, and disease.

When a woman is entering menopause, the menstrual cycle gradually decreases naturally (average age for menopause is 51 ½ years old). However, many women suffer from a condition called Endometriosis (internal excessive bleeding). This condition can lead to developing cancerous cysts. Another condition called “Fibroids”, which develop in a woman’s uterus, often contribute to excessive bleeding and can be extremely painful. See the following link to learn more about this condition. (http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/endometriosis/DS00289)

Cervical dysplasia is a condition related to estrogen dominance and is typically related to the human papillomavirus (HPV) and can be a pre-cancerous condition. Consumption of nonorganic food (food treated with chemicals likened to GMO’s) is thought to be a culprit behind this condition.

An extremely valuable article on this subject can be found at the following link (http://environmentalestrogen.wordpress.com/effects-on-women/). If you’re a female, with or without a history of female cancer, you must take proactive action to guard your family’s future health. Becoming aware of where the problem is rooted may just save a life.

The food industry is well aware of the concerns behind chemically induced products and will debate, that this is the only method suitable for supply and demand. But I beg to differ. Since the mid 1800’s, the onset of the menstruation cycle has dropped almost 10 years (17 to 9) throughout developed countries where pesticides and other chemicals are used during food production. There must be reasons for the extreme reduction in the female menstrual cycle and it can be just a coincidence.

Until the FDA agrees that all food must be labeled to reveal the chemicals used in production, then ignorance to its content and our consumption of it in our food will remain.

Stay tuned for more on how to be more proactive and preventative when it comes to guarding your health.

Quick Tips for Wellness: Be proactive, knowledgeable and guarded when it comes to your health.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved

Follow me on Facebook (Quick Tips for Wellness) and Twitter @wellnesstips4u

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Wellness for the "Angels" in your life: Pet proof...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Wellness for the "Angels" in your life: Pet proof...: Most of us go to the store, buying off the shelf products used to clean everything from windows to the floors, while never suspecting the...

Wellness for the "Angels" in your life: Pet proof your home from dangerous toxic chemicals

Most of us go to the store, buying off the shelf products used to clean everything from windows to the floors, while never suspecting they’re harmful or much less dangerous and deadly. Even when the “fine print” on their label clearly states they’re not safe, for some crazy reason.....we still buy them. Why? Partially, it’s perception and habit, but mostly it’s lack of knowledge about the choices surrounding our decisions.

While we can wear gloves, masks and wash our hands our animals are exposed to the dangerous chemicals we use without any protection. So how do you keep your home “pet safe” while also keeping it clean?

*Use organic, non-toxic/harmful product cleaners

*Keep all chemicals in airtight containers

*Keep your pet away when using chemicals and make certain the room is aired out before allowing them back in

*Read the label on all products and use the same precautions with your pet as you do for yourself and family

*Keep your pet away from floors, furniture and any surface recently cleaned with chemicals. Odors and residue can easily be absorbed into their skin, fur and lungs after use

*Wash your pet’s bowls regularly with the same care used to wash your dishes (the residue from “air borne” chemicals can be absorbed in their bowls and food)

*Keep your pets out of the yard when using any nonorganic lawn care treatment

*Put all chemicals “up and away” (off the ground) from anywhere your pet has access

*Secure items that could potentially spill and leak

*Keep all medicines secured

*Keep toilet lids down, especially when using “bowl” cleaner

*Inspect your room at the pet’s eye level – look for danger from their perspective

*Keep plants out of reach

We often take for granted what we know as humans assuming our pets are safe; but they’re not. When we practice all of the above we keep us and our precious pets safe!

Quick Tips for Wellness: Pet proofing your home from dangerous chemicals blesses both you both!


Quick tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved

Follow me on Facebook Quick Tips for Wellness, http://hamptonroads.com/blogs/quicktipsforwellness, Twitter @wellnesstips4U

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Fish oil no longer the equivalent to the real thin...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Fish oil no longer the equivalent to the real thin...: Recent studies show that fish oil supplements are not comparable to the real thing: Oily fish. For years, patients have been instructed ...

Fish oil no longer the equivalent to the real thing: Omega 3 fatty acids can’t be imitated according to research

Recent studies show that fish oil supplements are not comparable to the real thing: Oily fish. For years, patients have been instructed to consume these oily supplements to help their heart and prevent future disease. Now it seems that was probably in vain.

According the Journal of American Medicine, the conclusion following an in-depth study of the fish oil supplement using “randomized clinical trials evaluating the effect of omega-3 on all-cause mortality, cardiac death, sudden death, myocardial infarction, and stroke” the following conclusion was arrived:

“Overall, omega-3 PUFA supplementation was not associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, sudden death, myocardial infarction, or stroke based on relative and absolute measures of association.” (http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1357266&atab=7)

So, is this the first time a supplement like “fish oil” pills has been thrown under the bus for not being the effective product believed to be beneficial for our health? Should we stop taking fish oil supplements? Most importantly, should we take supplements at all?

The “Data Synthesis” collected in this report covered more than enough data to make a strong case for the JAMA’s conclusion:

“Conclusion: Overall, omega-3 PUFA supplementation was not associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, sudden death, myocardial infarction, or stroke based on relative and absolute measures of association.”

“Of the 3635 citations retrieved, 20 studies of 68 680 patients were included, reporting 7044 deaths, 3993 cardiac deaths, 1150 sudden deaths, 1837 myocardial infarctions, and 1490 strokes. No statistically significant association was observed with all-cause mortality.”

Before you invest in taking supplements to boost or supply your body with needed nutrients and minerals consider a few things that will make a greater impact to your health and wellness, overall:

*Diet. The study concluded very clearly that consuming oily fish naturally was superior to consuming a supplement. Most supplements are not FDA “tested”. Supplements do not change eating/nutritional habits. Most people who eat their nutrients also follow a healthier lifestyle, overall.

*Fitness. If you’re trying to live a heart healthy life, fitness is a must. Fish oil pills and/or any supplement cannot replace what your body needs from fitness and regular exercise.

*Preventative. Changing your lifestyle = Building a solid foundation for your wellness. When we try to “short cut” our wellness, through supplement consumption, we cheat our body of what it truly needs.

If you’re trying to live your life well, then stop taking short cuts to get there. It takes time to change but the benefits you receive over the course of your entire life will be well worth it. Unfortunately, most supplements do not provide what we expect nor do they change our habits or help us form new ones. Many are “watered down” versions of the real thing.

Organic food is always the healthier choice when it comes to eating “clean” food products (they are absent of chemicals and genetically modified products). If your budget doesn’t afford you the option of eating organic then start with eating healthy, whole and fresh food. Eat more oily fish, at least three times a week (salmon, sardines, etc.). Prepare every day to succeed (plan ahead). Attend a nutritional wellness class. Find a “workout” friend, who will inspire and influence you to stay the course. Most of all ask yourself “why” you need to change (not want to but need to) and how will you get there (plan of action). If you’re not a self-motivated type person, then seek professional guidance by a nutritional counselor.

Quick Tips for Wellness: Healthy living comes from living a healthy lifestyle.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved

Follow me on Facebook at Quick Tips for Wellness and Twitter @wellnesstips4u

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: The cost of sacrifice: Hope arrives for 9/11 Canc...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: The cost of sacrifice: Hope arrives for 9/11 Canc...: It may have taken eleven years and 70,000 possible victims later for the powers that be to do the right thing, but they finally did. Dr...

The cost of sacrifice: Hope arrives for 9/11 Cancer Victims

It may have taken eleven years and 70,000 possible victims later for the powers that be to do the right thing, but they finally did. Dr. John Howard, program administrator of the World Trade Center Health Program, announced on the eve of 9/11 that dozens of cancers will now be eligible for treatment and compensation. As recently as June, 2012 a list of 58 various types of cancers were added to the 14 various categories of related illnesses, providing needed medical treatment for many who were previously excluded.

The initial list only included a handful of recognized illnesses excluding cancer which they stated lacked enough evidence related to the tragedy and greatly thought to be due from dust, lingering airborne substances following the terrorist attack. However, many of those who helped in the following months with the initial clean up were amongst those also adversely affected in the aftermath of 9/11.

Fumes, dust and exposure to the smoldering wreckage was long thought to be the culprit behind ongoing illnesses suffered by first responders, but only until recently did those victims find any help from the government. Sadly, many passed away before help came.

Whether you helped in the clean up or lived near the destruction, those affected can be much farther reaching than those originally considered covered. First responders, firefighters, police officers, emergency medical care and residents in the outlying areas are likely to be victims of the lingering effects in the aftermath.

The cost of the cancer coverage only is currently estimated at $33 million and includes a small window of time for those victims; only five years. Originally, the bill was passed in the House to include a 30 year window of time, but eventually was shot down by the Senate to extend to only five years. Sadly, most of these victims may take ten-plus years before the evidence of their illness begins to appear.

WTC Health program

Applications are currently being accepted from potential victims and coverage. Enrollment for first responders to the Pentagon and Shanksville, PA site is expected to begin by late 2012 once eligibility guidelines and program benefits are defined.

Additionally, there is coverage for those responders who live outside the metropolitan area of New York City. If you assisted in the recovery, clean-up or even visited the area immediately after 9/11 you may want to start the application process to determine if you are covered.

To find out if you are eligible for the coverage, visit “The Center for Disease Control and Prevention” at http://www.cdc.gov/wtc/. An online questionnaire will take you through the initial step by step process.

Again, it could take a decade or more to realize the entire impact of this tragic event. If you are experiencing any possibly related symptoms, do not wait to receive the help. Monitoring and program benefits may be available to you now.

Quick Tips for Wellness: Take a moment today to thank God for your health, our great country and especially for those who risk their lives for all of ours.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: The use of medical marijuana hits the Presidential...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: The use of medical marijuana hits the Presidential...: What do Barrack Obama and Paul Ryan have in common (other than their United States issued birth certificates)? They both support the St...

The use of medical marijuana hits the Presidential arena: Ryan takes a stand with Obama for the States

What do Barrack Obama and Paul Ryan have in common (other than their United States issued birth certificates)? They both support the States controlling the use of medical marijuana. The Justice Department, under the Obama administration, agreed to continue the policy of allowing each state to mandate the use of medical marijuana back on October 19, 2009. Currently, 13 states have legalized the use of medical marijuana, and Paul Ryan agrees that’s exactly where the line should be drawn between the federal and state governments jurisdiction.

So what’s the big deal with the use of medical marijuana? Is it the image it casts (Cheech and Chong come to mind)? Or is it the influence it has over our culture, possibly sending a teetering message to society that it’s an “ok” recreational drug? Perhaps, it’s a little of both. Maybe, if we could better understand the origin of this drug for medicinal purposes, we might feel a little less apprehensive about its purpose.

History

Dating back to 2737 BC, the mystical Emperor Shen Neng of China became the first known public figure to endorse the use of medical Marijuana for everything from gout to poor memory (now that’s an oxymoron). Once this medicinal treatment caught on, cultures from Asia to Africa incorporated it into their medical regiment. Eventually, the use of marijuana spread beyond medicinal use as it was incorporated into various Hindu sects in India.

Between the 18th and 19th centuries, marijuana began making its way into the American culture, eventually becoming the drug of choice over other drugs like opium and morphine. By 1906, the “Pure Food and Drug Act”, issued by the FDA, finally set the first real drug control policies in place to protect the public. By 1914, the Harrison Act became the first law to define “drug use” as a crime, tiptoeing around State laws by implying a heavy sanction on certain legal drug products (like Opium) to be taxed so heavily that it would not make sense consuming it.

By 1937, almost half the United States had adopted state laws, outlawing marijuana for two primary reasons: Stop it from becoming the next drug of choice and to shut down the Mexican Cartel crossing the border (even back then) while profiting from their homegrown product. Sounds like a lot of the decisions around marijuana’s legalization stem more from who profits financially than the pro’s and con’s of its use (?).

Is medical marijuana a natural solution or just another “high”?

In my opinion anything you “smoke” and/or contains THC can’t be healthy for you. But then again, any drug for pain isn’t necessarily “healthy” for you either. What can’t be ignored is the need for having a balanced discussion on how it’s controlled, issued, the addictive qualities it possesses and the lasting side effects.

Speed fast forward and you’ll find the drug is commonly prescribed to remedy the after effects of everything from cancer treatment to general pain management. If this drug is so effective in managing pain then why is it so misunderstood? Perhaps, it’s the misunderstanding of what it’s primarily meant to benefit (medical pain) and that it has been declared illegal to possess outside of that purpose.

The primary control over its issuance is realistically another issue all together: Commerce. Wouldn’t it realistically make more “cents” collecting a tax on a drug that has been a medically approved method for treatment than not legalizing its use under certain conditions? Certainly, there are other equally addictive and concerning drugs issued to people every day (Demerol, Oxycodone, Percocet, etc.), that have just as many side effects and are proved to be equally addictive.

I’m not for recreational drug use; but, I am for common sense. If medical marijuana is a less harmful choice of pain management medication then it should accessible when prescribed and control should remain within each state.

Quick Tips for Wellness: Know the potential side effects of any drug you consume before you decide upon the drug of choice.
Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All rights reserved

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Dangers of giving melatonin induced sleep aid to c...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Dangers of giving melatonin induced sleep aid to c...: Most cranky kids are usually just overtired and need one thing: Sleep; but not at the risk of their life. Synthetic melatonin, a sleep...

Dangers of giving melatonin induced sleep aid to children

Most cranky kids are usually just overtired and need one thing: Sleep; but not at the risk of their life. Synthetic melatonin, a sleep aid given orally, is the latest answer some parents are seeking when their child won’t go to sleep. A sleep aid should only be administered when prescribed by a medical professional. To assume that over the counter melatonin is a safe choice for your child would be a mistake. Low melatonin occurs when our body fails to produce naturally what we need for our sleep cycle.

“Melatonin’s main job in the body is to regulate night and day cycles or sleep-wake cycles. Darkness causes the body to produce more melatonin, which signals the body to prepare for sleep. Light decreases melatonin production and signals the body to prepare for being awake. Some people who have trouble sleeping have low levels of melatonin. It is thought that adding melatonin from supplements might help them sleep.” (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/940.html)

So why are our kids struggling to go to sleep? Perhaps it’s just as simple as a few things:

*Nutrition. Nothing helps the body more than natural nutrition. Preservatives in food contain residual effect products that have slow release reactions in our body. High fructose corn syrup (a common sweetener used in most packaged foods) and refined sugar should be avoided.

*Overstimulation. From computers to television, our kid’s brains are on overload.

*Light. Some children are afraid to go to sleep in the dark and insist on leaving a light on to go to sleep. Darkness helps stimulate the melatonin while light resists the production.

*Stress. Children are exposed now more than ever to a stressed-out, both economically and socially. Many families lives have been disrupted by the uncertainties that many now face, transfering that stress to their children behind closed doors.

So what can you “naturally” do to help your children get a good night’s sleep?
• Feed them healthy whole food.
• Stop late night snacking and if they absolutely must have something to eat, give them almonds, walnuts or some form of complex carbohydrates.
• Have more one on one time with them before they go to bed. Talk about their day, their feelings and what’s on their mind. Sometimes something as simple as allowing your child to “release” their thoughts while reassuring them that you’re there, and they’re safe, does wonders to help them cope with their surroundings.
• Create family time. Play a board game. Turn off the television, computers and music. Read a book together. Go for an evening walk. Schedule evening workouts together at home.
• Buy them a journal. Teach your kids to write down what they did that day, how they feel and what their hopes and dreams are for their future.

When we engage in our children’s lives, we teach them how to cope with life, manage stress and work through their problems, naturally. Many times, sleeplessness is a result of physical and psychological stress. Kids are not immune to the same emotions adult’s experience. Before you try a synthetic answer, reach for a natural remedy. The body naturally produces melatonin when surrounded with a natural, healthy environment. Synthetic melatonin can only provide temporary relief; however, it’s not solving the root of the problem. Unless your child has psychological disabilities and has been prescribed medication for treatment by a doctor, don't assume the over the counter drug is the answer.

Some of the side effects from synthetic melatonin have been reported to include: Headaches, nausea and irritability. Overuse of a synthetic product can produce unknown buildup in our body, which may later produce a resistance to its effectiveness. What we never know about a supplement is how it will affect everyone and/or how over time it will create other side effects.

Quick Tips for Wellness: Before you reach for a pill, reach for an answer that will provide natural results.


Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved

Follow me on Facebook (Quick Tips for Wellness) and Twitter @wellnesstips4u

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Does fitness make you smarter?

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Does fitness make you smarter?: Most parents are considerably worried how they’ll be able to afford sending their kids to college, especially in the economic times we’re ...

Does fitness make you smarter?

Most parents are considerably worried how they’ll be able to afford sending their kids to college, especially in the economic times we’re facing today. But what if you found a better way to “save” for your kid’s college education through practicing two things? Would you do it? And what if you found a way for your child to learn more effectively in the classroom? Would you be willing to be a pioneer for change in the outdated academic setting that is way overdue for drastic change?

Science has proven that children, who are nutritionally fed and stay physically active during the learning process, are more likely to have higher test scores and better opportunities academically. Now think about that statement for a moment and ask yourself two questions about your children’s current academic setting:

*Does my school serve “healthy lunches and snacks” or am I sending my child to school with a healthy lunch/snack? By healthy, I’m implying that the food served is not processed, fried and/or sugar coated but is whole, fresh food. Most importantly, does the school promote or allow soda vending machines/sugary drinks and junk food snacks? If a school systems allows us to feed our kids junk during the day, shame on them.

*How often, throughout each class, is my child physically moving and interacting? If your kid is sitting still for more than about 25 minutes, that’s too long. If PE is one class during the day, that’s not enough. If the teacher's academic plan doesn’t include intermittent physical activity but requires that students “sit still”, that’s ridiculous.

While order and organization are both necessary in a classroom, we’ve got it all wrong when we misunderstand the benefit of keeping kids “moving” while learning, as well as keeping their brains “fed”.

Exercise increases intelligence

A study by the Department of Kinesiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, investigated the relationship between age, aerobic fitness, and cognitive function by comparing high- and low-fit preadolescent children and adults. The study revealed the following:

“These findings suggest that fitness was positively associated with neuroelectric indices of attention and working memory, and response speed in children. Fitness was also associated with cognitive processing speed, but these findings were not age-specific. These data indicate that fitness may be related to better cognitive functioning in preadolescents and have implications for increasing cognitive health in children and adults.” (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16286868)

The Stroop Test & Exercise

There are several ways in which to measure intelligence, but one method known as The Stroop Test has been widely used since 1935. Using random color names, printed against opposite colors (for example, white is printed in the color red, etc.) the subject is presented with the task of identifying the color while overcoming ignoring the printed name. The results have shown it takes more time to switch the brain from being able to differentiate between the two while answering correctly. The purpose of the test is to determine “habitual responses” (reading) over less familiar/challenging tasks, like name the color versus reading the color name.

To test the theory that exercise increases brain intelligence, the Stroop Test was administered using teenaged children who were more physically fit. The results revealed that the more fit the student the higher they scored.

“A study published in the January 2008 issue of "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise" examined the relationship between aerobic fitness in adolescents and their performance on the Stroop Test. Researchers concluded that teens with higher levels of fitness performed better on the test than those with lower fitness levels.”

Read more: http://www.livestrong.com/article/543538-does-exercise-affect-intelligence/#ixzz25gOAFeV1

Fitter kids = better academic scores

The annual Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting in Denver (May 1, 2011) revealed an amazing transformation and increased test scores when incorporating exercise and fitness in grade-school children: Scores were raised dramatically when fitness was incorporated with learning (from 55% to 68.5%). Teachers and students both benefit when incorporating fitness within the academic process. The more oxygen is supplied to the brain, the better. Short, intermittent breaks involving physical activity would do wonders in our children’s educational experience. Why educators have not fully incorporated this concept is beyond me.

I can personally attest to the academic benefits when incorporating fitness during the educational process. One of my children was diagnosed with ADHD and had fallen behind in school. Upon taking him out of the normal academic setting into a homeschooling atmosphere, I was able to integrate fitness and healthy snacks during his day. The results were dramatic: His reading level and test scores were above his peers by three grade levels at the end of the first year. You could say it was due to him having one on one education, but in truth, you can’t force someone to learn/absorb information. Period. What I did to incur such dramatic results was two things:

1) I taught him in 15-20 minute increments. After each session, he was given a quick fitness break or fed a small snack (i.e. Run in place, go outside and run around, eat an apple, etc). Not only did he benefit physically, his attention span increased, and his hypertension reduced.

2) Healthy snacks = A healthy brain. The brain, especially in the morning, needs healthy carbohydrates. Stabilizing blood glucose in the body through consuming healthy snacks benefits the brain.

3) The academic setting may not seem like a well suited one for what I’m recommending, but I cannot see why it would not be if given an opportunity to be tested. The average attention span of the brain is about 8 minutes. When we physically move, our brain’s hippocampus kicks into gear regenerating brain function. Demanding that anyone sit in one position and learn is outdated and doesn’t work for the majority of people. Academically it doesn’t make sense demanding more than what is natural or helpful to the body and the brain.

I’ve always said if the “smartest” amongst us only represents a small percentage of the population then something is horribly wrong with our academic structure. If a homeschooling mom can figure out that concept, then so should our school system.

Quick Tips for Wellness: Parents are a child’s ultimate teacher. Get involved (i.e. volunteer, be active in the PTA, offer your time and talent) in your child’s academic setting and don’t settle for anything less than what is in the best interest of their education.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved

Follow me on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Quick-Tips-for-Wellness/162364967179512) and Twitter @wellnesstips4U

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Affordable Care Act climbs in bed with the health ...

Quick Tips for Everyday Wellness: Affordable Care Act climbs in bed with the health ...: If you thought “Big Brother” was just a figure head, think again. Tufts Medical Center received $88.5 million from the Federal Government ...

Affordable Care Act climbs in bed with the health Insurance Industry, lending a pilot program over $88.5 million of tax-payers money

If you thought “Big Brother” was just a figure head, think again. Tufts Medical Center received $88.5 million from the Federal Government to “try” an innovative idea that might just become the standard in the healthcare industry, should it work: Consumer controlled health insurance. This "model" will likely become the new standard for coverage. Doesn't sound so bad, does it? Empower the people to control their own health care and you have a win-win situation, right? Wrong. Here's why:

First, it must be funded by tax dollars (as if we're not already taxed enough). In the case of Tufts Medical Center's pilot program, we're the banker through government low interest loans. Why are we paying for it when the insurance industry is overwhelming wealthy? The Obama Administration knew that unless they “pony-up” some big support the health insurance companies wouldn’t be able to keep their end of the bargain to insure everyone. Thus they were promised practically free money in exchange for their compliance.

One pilot program says “yes” to a low interest loan paid for by you and me

According to a recent article by the Boston Globe, the Tufts Medical Center's pilot program is part of Obama’s solution to solve the healthcare crisis. However, even they’re saying “it could be a flop” and not work. The loan, which is offered at next to nothing interest, must be paid back in 15 years. But what if it fails? Does that mean $88.5 million buckaroos just went out the window?

In a nutshell, here’s what the government did to help fund the Tufts Medical Center health insurance plan:

*Awarded $88.5 million loan to create that state’s only member-owned health insurance plan, offering coverage in Eastern and Central Massachusetts, start January 2014

*The pilot program is focused on lowering premiums through barely complying with the Federal Government requirements

*Insurance products sold to individuals and small businesses through insurance brokers and the Massachusetts Health Connector


In addition, to underwriting the Massachusetts program, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has approved 20 “consumer operated and oriented” plans, as allowed under the Affordable Care Act to insurers not licensed before 2009.

“We don’t have anything on the market like this” in Massachusetts, said John ¬McDon¬ough, a Harvard health policy professor who had a hand in drafting the federal law. Depending on how it is implemented and received by consumers in the state, McDonough said, the program could become “a belly flop” or “a disruptive innovation worth watching.”



The whole idea of lowering insurance premiums runs on one cylinder: The over collected premium dollars go back into the plan to help lower premiums.

“Consumers who are members of this plan will ultimately participate and be in control of the governance long-term,” said Ellen Zane, former chief executive of Tufts Medical Center and chairwoman of the plan’s starting board.

But here’s the catch: Which hospitals, doctors and care facilities are onboard to participate? So far, it’s not looking so good. Only 17 doctors and hospitals have signed on to be included in the network of care providers. What that means is simply this: The less number of participants equals less access to “affordable healthcare insurance”.

The math is simple: If you take something away, you get less in the end.

The premise of the program rests on one theory: Doctors and hospitals must be willing to work for less compensation. In this case, less does not equal more. Healthcare providers, who are in business to make money, would never willing take less compensation in exchange for providing more accessible health care services. The math doesn’t add up and the outcome isn’t realistic.

Regardless of what you may think about what they (healthcare providers) charge, the Affordable Care Act is underwriting the insurance industry so that they’ll be able to meet the demand of including everybody, which is necessary to say the very least. However, why not just reveal to the public how the ACA is being funded? Politics. If Obama had not struck this agreement upfront, the health insurance companies would be screaming bloody murder!

And that, my friends, is why the insurance industry supported Obama-Care and the Affordable Care Act. Everybody knew that the insurance companies had to have a “win-win” in the end…..We just didn’t know it would be coming out of our own pockets.

Quick Tips for Wellness: The Affordable Care Act is the new banker for the Insurance Industry.

Quick Tips for Wellness ™ Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved

Follow me on Facebook and Twitter @wellnesstips4u

Resource: http://bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2012/09/01/hospital-providers-develop-state-only-member-owned-health-plan/xUDnDa9dhWutgvmQroWY9I/story.html